Skip to main content

Fathers Need to Share the ‘Sacred No’ With Their Kids

engin akyurt gJILnne HFg unsplash 1 scaled 37556337
So many people struggle with a father wound – they needed fathering and didn’t get it, and they spend their lives subconsciously trying to fill the gaps and get to wholeness. Richard Rohr talks about how the role of a father revolves around the “sacred no” – he prot…
By Seth Barnes

So many people struggle with a father wound – they needed fathering and didn’t get it, and they spend their lives subconsciously trying to fill the gaps and get to wholeness.

Richard Rohr talks about how the role of a father revolves around the “sacred no” – he protects and establishes boundaries, even at the risk of conflict. A father wounds his children when he fails to protect them by answering the probes and attacks of others with a sacred no.

Young people wrestling to define the world and their place in it need boundaries. If the answer to every question is “yes,” then boundaries are not established – things lose their value. Only the answer “no” can establish those boundaries – and that is a fathering role (as in, “No, you may not date my 13 year-old daughter”).

While mothers can and do tap into the wisdom and strength of will to answer questions with “no,” generally speaking, it conflicts with their nurturing nature. One consequence is that children without fathers often struggle with boundaries. Their self-will runs amok.

When families and communities bond and develop social compacts which include prohibitions and protections, they need people who will make good on their promises to one another. Historically, this has required fathers to become warriors, committed to protecting not just the community, but its values and the boundaries they represent. They stand prepared to fight against those who would cross the boundaries.

Our Christian faith in America is decaying precisely because the fathers have become neutered, have lost the sacred no inside themselves, and can no longer offer it to their children, much less as warriors to defend values in the faith.

In fact, the concept of the warrior has become so associated with the nation-state and its ambiguous conflicts in places like Iraq and Viet Nam, that the practice of accommodation (saying “yes” when really the answer should be “no”) has taken precedence over the practice of defending boundaries.

Men need to reclaim their stewardship of the sacred no. Too many men have gone the way of the Samurai, trading in their swords for easy chairs. There are things worth fighting for and dying for.

Too many parents are more concerned about the physical risk their child may incur as they struggle to find their faith in a foreign land than they are with the spiritual risk of passing on to them the inheritance of a stillborn faith.

Those of us with father wounds, who, even as adults struggle with the issues of protection we never received, need to consider the consequences of passing our issues on to our children.

Next: How to share the sacred “yes”

Comments (3)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

about team